Bug#949826: buster-pu: package haproxy/1.8.19-1
- To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Cc: 949826@bugs.debian.org, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Subject: Bug#949826: buster-pu: package haproxy/1.8.19-1
- From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 15:11:22 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] m3bljuh5ol.fsf@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>, 949826@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20200731081419.GA573351@eldamar.local> (Salvatore Bonaccorso's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:14:19 +0200")
- References: <20200126045010.GA5107@pisco.westfalen.local> <157995954497.304636.1653483675690470170.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx> <m3blqqh1gg.fsf@debian.org> <20200208074322.GA1841118@eldamar.local> <157995954497.304636.1653483675690470170.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx> <87eev5cspd.fsf@debian.org> <157995954497.304636.1653483675690470170.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx> <9cc20d068213e6848ba8bf8effa279c39abd549d.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <157995954497.304636.1653483675690470170.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx> <20200508120341.GA978478@eldamar.local> <20200731081419.GA573351@eldamar.local> <157995954497.304636.1653483675690470170.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx>
❦ 31 juillet 2020 10:14 +02, Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>> > > > This needs to be rebased to the 1.8.19-1+deb10u1 which was released
>> > > > as
>> > > > DSA 4577-1 AFAICT.
>> > >
>> > > Oh, sorry. Here is the updated patch.
>> >
>> > Please go ahead.
>>
>> Too late for buster 10.4 but actually this would need to be rebased to
>> the 1.8.19-1+deb10u2 as there was another DSA for haproxy (but not
>> including this CVE fix). So the version will be 1.8.19-1+deb10u3 by
>> now.
>>
>> If before the next point release will be another haproxy update this
>> fix for the CVE can be included as well, IMHO.
>
> Did you saw the acknowledgement from vom Adam? Could you upload to
> buster-proposed-updates?
Hello Salvatore,
I've just uploaded it.
--
Each module should do one thing well.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: