[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#871683: marked as done (release.debian.org: mail_autoremovals.pl should not send any copy to packages.qa.debian.org)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:39:59 +0200
with message-id <20200908083959.GA87269@home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Fixed in git
has caused the Debian Bug report #871683,
regarding release.debian.org: mail_autoremovals.pl should not send any copy to packages.qa.debian.org
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
871683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871683
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

I currently get multiple copies of "foo is marked for autoremoval" for
each package that I'm subscribed to via the package tracker. The problem
is that I get one copy through foo@packages.debian.org which forwards
to the tracker and one copy through foo_summary@packages.qa.debian.org
which also forwards to the tracker.

I would like you to:

- only send to foo@packages.debian.org since this is sufficient for
  the tracker to get a copy (and anyway mailing @packages.qa.debian.org
  has been deprecated since December 2015:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg00001.html)

- add an header to help me to identify those emails so that they
  are classified automatically with the "summary" tag instead of the default
  "contact" tag that they get when they come through @packages.debian.org
  I suggest to add "X-Debian: release.debian.org/autoremovals" to all
  autoremoval related mails. That's the header that most tools are using
  to identify Debian-specific emails.

Note that you could also add the "X-Debian-Package: foo" which is another
convention we are already using in many tools.

Thank you!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers oldoldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
This has been fixed with the merge of this MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/merge_requests/6

Cheers,
-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋    The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS

--- End Message ---
Reply to: