On 1/23/20 5:15 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 1/22/20 9:40 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: >> On 17-01-2020 11:22, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Am I correct in saying that it makes a lot of sense to take this >> transition together with the netcdf transition? If so, please combine >> that transition and go ahead with that one as well. > > All affected packages are also part of the netcdf transition, these > would only have to be rebuilt once when combining the transitions. > > I'll upload netcdf to unstable first, once that's built everywhere > netcdf-fortan will follow. Both netcdf (1:4.7.3-1) & netcdf-fortran (4.5.2+ds-1) are now built & installed on all release architectures. The binNMUs for netcdf-fortran can be scheduled as well. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature