On 1/22/20 9:40 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 17-01-2020 11:22, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> netcdf-fortran bumped its SONAME requiring a transition. > > Please go ahead. Thanks. > Am I correct in saying that it makes a lot of sense to take this > transition together with the netcdf transition? If so, please combine > that transition and go ahead with that one as well. All affected packages are also part of the netcdf transition, these would only have to be rebuilt once when combining the transitions. I'll upload netcdf to unstable first, once that's built everywhere netcdf-fortan will follow. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature