Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: block -1 by 947805 Hi Laurent, Andreas, On 31-12-2019 01:20, Laurent Bigonville wrote: >> peony-extensions - no rdeps, unmaintained <--- temporary removal? >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ not really, the package is >> aging now in unstable as it had recent updates > AFAICS peony-extensions has no dependency against gssdp or gupnp, so > that's fine I guess Right, it's not listed here: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gssdp.html or here: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gupnp.html >> upnp-router-control - no rdeps, unmaintained for years <-- permament >> removal? > > That package definitely look unmaintained (no upload since 2013), I see > some recent activity upstream (a few uploads in 2019, the previous > uploads where somewhere in 2013), but even the development branch does > not built with the last version of gssdp/gupnp > > I've opened a bug upstream and I just opened a serious bug in debian > > So I guess that removing the package from testing should be fine for now? What I was missing here is that/how upnp-router-control is broken with the new version. But I see you mentioned that in the bug: FTBFS. Your transition isn't colliding with any other (yet), so let's start this and see if anybody steps up for upnp-router-control in the coming 2 weeks and if not, remove it for the migration of gssdp. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature