Hi Laurent, Andreas,
On 30-12-2019 15:09, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> So apparently this was a bug in gupnp that was making the tests deadlock
> and for some reasons the version fixing this was stuck in the armel
> buildd...
>
> anyway, gupnp-igd is now building fine in experimental.
Good.
> I think most of the work is already done in experimental, could we go
> forward?
What's the current status of the two packages reported unfixed? It's not
clear if they either FTBFS or if they are just not tried to be fixed in
experimental. I asked to have bugs filed, but I didn't spot them.
peony-extensions - no rdeps, unmaintained <--- temporary removal?
^^^^^^^^^^^^ not really, the package is
aging now in unstable as it had recent updates
upnp-router-control - no rdeps, unmaintained for years <-- permament
removal?
If this is cleared up, we can probably go ahead.
Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature