[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#939048: marked as done (transition: glibc)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Sep 2019 21:18:41 +0200
with message-id <2f71052f-e97d-b9bd-5102-17e716c08737@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#939048: transition: glibc
has caused the Debian Bug report #939048,
regarding transition: glibc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
939048: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939048
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.29. It is available in
experimental for a bit more than 2 weeks and there is no known issue or
regression. It has been built successfully on all release architectures
and most ports architectures. It fails to build on alpha, ia64 and
sparc64 due to a few testsuite issues that are being investigated or
need to be investigated and which do not looks really worrying. It
doesn't build on kfreebsd-*, but this has been the case for a few
glibc releases already.

As glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
rebuilt for this transition (some packages only on some architectures):
 - apitrace
 - bro
 - dante
 - gcc-9
 - gcc-snapshot
 - glibc
 - libnih
 - libnss-db
 - unscd

Ben file:

Here is the corresponding ben file:
  title = "glibc";
  is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</;
  is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.30\)/;
  is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.29\)/;

In addition a few new symbols have been added that might prevent a few
other packages to migrate to testing until glibc migrates if they pick
up the new symbols. Those are posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np,
posix_spawn_file_actions_addfchdir_np, getcpu, exp, exp2, log, log2 and
pow. The math functions are probably used by quite a few packages.

Thanks for considering.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:39:20 +0200 Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> wrote:
> On 2019-09-08 22:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > 
> > Hi Aurelien,
> > 
> > Let's have this going.
> 
> Ok, I have just uploaded it.

It's all finished now, closing.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: