Hi Aurelien, On 01-09-2019 23:03, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#glibc > > I picked up a few issues, and they were false positive: Thanks for doing so. > - dante: needs to be binNMUed against the new libc You already identified that in your first mail. :) > - dwarves-dfsg: debci issue, it looks like the experimental-debug > repository is missing. Ah, right. I'll contact the maintainer. He tried to avoid using his own debug packages due to the same issue. We overlooked this use-case. > - gnuplot: temporary issue due to a new upload. > - haskell-hopenpgp: packages are not installable due to the haskell > transition > - nemo: seems to be a bug in udisks2 postinst script > - pg-repack: debci issue, the regression is caused by libpq5 from > experimental, which is wrongly selected instead of the unstable > version. > - repmgr: ditto with libpq-dev. > - slurm-llnl: the packages are not installable, glibc doesn't seem to be > the cause. Ack, will check later. > There are also a few failures that seems to be related to slight change > of precision of the math functions: pyfai, sextractor. So what do you propose with these? Do they need to fix something? E.g. their autopkgtest? Then we better warn them *now*, i.e. filing bugs. Paul PS: more results pouring in tonight.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature