Bug#905889: transition: gdbm

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

On 09/10/2018 16:36, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> 
> [2018-10-05 17:30] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
>> On 04/10/2018 03:40, KAction@gnu.org wrote:
>>>
>>> [2018-10-02 09:38] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
>>>> part       text/plain                 567
>>>> On 11/08/2018 09:40, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello. According to [1] I request approval of upload gdbm-1.17 into
>>>>> unstable. It will affect 28 packages, 26 of which build cleanly
>>>>> (no-changes source upload will be required) and I am ready to NMU
>>>>> patches for two others (perl and qsf).
>>>
>>>> Is perl still unfixed? With the upcoming perl transition, that's
>>>> something th at I wouldn't like to see fixed through an NMU at this
>>>> point.
>>>
>>> No, according to #904005, Perl maintainer fixed this issue himself.
>>> Only qsf left {no response from maintainer, will NMU}.
>>
>> Let's do this now.
> 
> Uploaded to unstable. binNMU is automatic, correct?

Not automatic, no. I'll schedule them when gdbm has built everywhere.

Cheers,
Emilio