Bug#905889: transition: gdbm

[Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@gnu.org>]

[2018-10-05 17:30] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
> On 04/10/2018 03:40, KAction@gnu.org wrote:
> > 
> > [2018-10-02 09:38] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
> >> part       text/plain                 567
> >> On 11/08/2018 09:40, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> >>> Package: release.debian.org
> >>> Severity: normal
> >>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> >>> Usertags: transition
> >>>
> >>> Hello. According to [1] I request approval of upload gdbm-1.17 into
> >>> unstable. It will affect 28 packages, 26 of which build cleanly
> >>> (no-changes source upload will be required) and I am ready to NMU
> >>> patches for two others (perl and qsf).
> > 
> >> Is perl still unfixed? With the upcoming perl transition, that's
> >> something th at I wouldn't like to see fixed through an NMU at this
> >> point.
> > 
> > No, according to #904005, Perl maintainer fixed this issue himself.
> > Only qsf left {no response from maintainer, will NMU}.
> 
> Let's do this now.

Uploaded to unstable. binNMU is automatic, correct?