Bug#893705: stretch-pu: package trafficserver/7.0.0-6+deb9u1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear release team,
I'd like to upload a new version of package trafficserver into stable.
The only change is related to trafficserver-dev dependencies which currently break piuparts tests.
Diff is:
- --- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ Description: experimental plugins for Apache Traffic Server
Package: trafficserver-dev
Architecture: any
- -Depends: ${misc:Depends}
- -Suggests: trafficserver (= ${binary:Version})
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, trafficserver (= ${binary:Version})
Description: Apache Traffic Server Software Developers Kit (SDK)
This package provides the Apache Traffic Server Software Developers Kit.
This is a collection of development header and bindings for the C programming
Any advice or comment will be welcomed.
Cheers,
Jean Baptiste
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Bkvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: