[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#892703: marked as done (nmu: lots of libraries on mips + mipsel for fpxx)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:27:52 +0100
with message-id <132367b5-b316-f254-d884-ea17707ddd7a@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#892703: nmu: lots of libraries on mips + mipsel for fpxx
has caused the Debian Bug report #892703,
regarding nmu: lots of libraries on mips + mipsel for fpxx
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892703: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892703
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
For mips and mipsel, we are working on FPXX migration, and this package seems quite old,
So the rebuilding is needed to use the current default gcc options.

--
YunQiang Su

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 14/03/18 14:10, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/03/18 11:50, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Control: retitle -1 nmu: lots of libraries on mips + mipsel for fpxx
>>
>> [+ CC debian-mips]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:15:38 +0800 YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: binnmu
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> For mips and mipsel, we are working on FPXX migration, and this package
>>> seems quite old,
>>> So the rebuilding is needed to use the current default gcc options.
>>
>> Background: FPXX was enabled in Debian in gcc-5 in the middle of 2015.
>> FPXX needs to be enabled in all libraries loaded into the same address
>> space to be able to use the alternative FR1 mode on 32-bit MIPS which is
>> required to use MSA. Now some people have complained that MSA does not
>> work in some complex packages because they depend on libraries without
>> FPXX enabled.
>>
>> I scanned the archive for libraries built without FPXX and were last
>> built over 2 years ago. I generated the following list of 201 packages
>> which would be useful to binNMU on mips and mipsel. Does this seem
>> reasonable?
> 
> I have binNMUed these 4 packages which I have seen complaints about. The
> rest of the packages should still be done but are not as important.
> 
> ALREADY DONE
> ==========
> nmu uriparser_0.8.4-1 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI'
> nmu libglu_9.0.0-2.1 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI'
> nmu libxt_1:1.1.5-1 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI'
> nmu libxmu_2:1.1.2-2 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI'
> ==========

All the rest scheduled now, with slightly decreased build priority so it doesn't
stall the rest of the packages for a couple of days. The build queue is
practically empty anyway so these should build rather quickly.

BTW you guys requested this during the stretch cycle in #825342, but in the end
closed it as not needed.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: