Hi, On 12/03/18 11:50, James Cowgill wrote: > Control: retitle -1 nmu: lots of libraries on mips + mipsel for fpxx > > [+ CC debian-mips] > > Hi, > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:15:38 +0800 YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu >> Severity: normal >> >> For mips and mipsel, we are working on FPXX migration, and this package >> seems quite old, >> So the rebuilding is needed to use the current default gcc options. > > Background: FPXX was enabled in Debian in gcc-5 in the middle of 2015. > FPXX needs to be enabled in all libraries loaded into the same address > space to be able to use the alternative FR1 mode on 32-bit MIPS which is > required to use MSA. Now some people have complained that MSA does not > work in some complex packages because they depend on libraries without > FPXX enabled. > > I scanned the archive for libraries built without FPXX and were last > built over 2 years ago. I generated the following list of 201 packages > which would be useful to binNMU on mips and mipsel. Does this seem > reasonable? I have binNMUed these 4 packages which I have seen complaints about. The rest of the packages should still be done but are not as important. ALREADY DONE ========== nmu uriparser_0.8.4-1 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI' nmu libglu_9.0.0-2.1 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI' nmu libxt_1:1.1.5-1 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI' nmu libxmu_2:1.1.2-2 . mips mipsel . -m 'Rebuild with FPXX ABI' ========== Thanks. James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature