[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#892212: marked as done (nmu: otb_6.4.0+dfsg-1)



Your message dated Wed, 7 Mar 2018 10:12:57 +0100
with message-id <8b5ba8c6-4e57-860e-f17a-c5fb7c7f717d@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#892212: nmu: otb_6.4.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #892212,
regarding nmu: otb_6.4.0+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892212: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892212
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Please rebuild otb (6.4.0+dfsg-1) with ossim (2.3.0-1) in unstable.

nmu otb_6.4.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libossim-dev (>= 2.3.0)"

The rebuild is required to fix symbol lookup errors, see:

 https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2018/03/msg00001.html

Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 07/03/18 10:03, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2018-03-07 09:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 06/03/18 20:35, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: binnmu
>>>
>>> Please rebuild otb (6.4.0+dfsg-1) with ossim (2.3.0-1) in unstable.
>>>
>>> nmu otb_6.4.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libossim-dev (>=
>>> 2.3.0)"
>>>
>>> The rebuild is required to fix symbol lookup errors, see:
>>>
>>>  https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2018/03/msg00001.html
>>
>> Sounds like an ABI break in libossim, which would need a SONAME bump or at the
>> very least a package rename or some Breaks.
> 
> OSSIM upstream is not great, we cannot expect them to do proper library
> versioning unfortunately.
> 
> I'll add Breaks for the two OTB libraries that depend on libossim1.

Alright. binNMU scheduled.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: