Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bootstrapping rustc/cargo for stretch

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 19:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 12:46 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 09/10/2018 12:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > I suggest that someone triggers binNMUs for all four packages
> > > > now
> > > > as Julien suggested.
> > > 
> > > Do those need doing in order? (i.e. do we need to binNMU rust,
> > > and
> > > then binNMU cargo against the rust binNMUs?)
> > 
> > No, the order doesn't matter. I'd suggest rustc first to see that
> > the actual compiler builds correctly on the buildds.
> 
> I've scheduled the rustc rebuilds.

and then cargo, which I've just accepted.

As it happens:
- the firefox-esr builds weren't marked as Failed, so automatically
built as soon as Adrian's uploads hit p-u, rather than being built
against the binNMUs as we'd originally planned
- there's since been a new rustc upload in any case, to fix the SSE-on-
i386 issues.

Thanks all.

Regards,

Adam