Bug#877195: the patches
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 13:22 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> What's the situation with this one? Could it be included in the next
> Stretch
> update?
The +confirmed and "... then OK" in my mail of December 2nd that you
quote below was intended as an acknowledgement that you could go ahead
with the upload.
> On Saturday, 9 December 2017 1:33:39 PM AEDT Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Saturday, 2 December 2017 11:05:24 AM AEDT Adam D. Barratt
> > wrote:
> > > IFF it's versioned as 2:2.20161023.1-9+deb9u1, uses "stretch" as
> > > the
> > > changelog distribution, is otherwise identical to the diff
> > > presented in
> > > this bug log and is built and tested on a stretch system, then
> > > OK.
> >
> > I've attached a debdiff that only differs in file timestamps, the
> > version
> > change you requested, and the changelog timestamp.
> >
> > I have tested it on my main mail server, one of my main web
> > servers, one of
> > my minor mail servers, and a shell server. It passed all tests and
> > did
> > everything as well as expected with no regressions.
> >
> > Please consider it for inclusion.
>
>
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: