Bug#877195: the patches
What's the situation with this one? Could it be included in the next Stretch
update?
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 1:33:39 PM AEDT Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 December 2017 11:05:24 AM AEDT Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > IFF it's versioned as 2:2.20161023.1-9+deb9u1, uses "stretch" as the
> > changelog distribution, is otherwise identical to the diff presented in
> > this bug log and is built and tested on a stretch system, then OK.
>
> I've attached a debdiff that only differs in file timestamps, the version
> change you requested, and the changelog timestamp.
>
> I have tested it on my main mail server, one of my main web servers, one of
> my minor mail servers, and a shell server. It passed all tests and did
> everything as well as expected with no regressions.
>
> Please consider it for inclusion.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
Reply to: