[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#876561: marked as done (transition: gdal)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:11:05 +0200
with message-id <adbee49f-34d0-0eaf-c70d-fbe2e57c73a8@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#876561: transition: gdal
has caused the Debian Bug report #876561,
regarding transition: gdal
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
876561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876561
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.2.

Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.2.1 (#866797), there is no SONAME
bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol
changes.

All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.2.2 from
experimental as summarized below, except gazebo.

gazebo (7.8.1+dfsg-1) FTBFS for some unclear reason unrelated to gdal
(it FTBFS with plain unstable too):

 [ 88%] Built target gazebo_gui
 make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/gazebo-7.8.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
 Makefile:165: recipe for target 'all' failed


libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.2.2 version will be
uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU,
the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead.


A complication for the transition is the inability to build the gdal
package on armhf, due to an issue with ca-certificates-java:

 Setting up ca-certificates-java (20170531+nmu1) ...
 Error: missing `server' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-armhf/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so'.
 Please install or use the JRE or JDK that contains these missing components.

But openjdk-8-jdk-headless cannot be installed because it depends on
ca-certificates-java, see:

 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdal&arch=armhf&ver=2.2.1%2Bdfsg-2%2Bb2&stamp=1505204615&raw=0


Ben file:

title = "gdal";
is_affected = .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-2-1" | .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-2-2";
is_good = .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-2-2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "gdal-abi-2-2-1";


Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 05/10/17 18:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 07:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 11:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2017 07:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/17 22:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>> On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/17 21:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.2.1 (#866797), there is no SONAME
>>>>>>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol
>>>>>>> changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.2.2 from
>>>>>>> experimental as summarized below, except gazebo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gazebo (7.8.1+dfsg-1) FTBFS for some unclear reason unrelated to gdal
>>>>>>> (it FTBFS with plain unstable too):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  [ 88%] Built target gazebo_gui
>>>>>>>  make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/gazebo-7.8.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
>>>>>>>  Makefile:165: recipe for target 'all' failed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.2.2 version will be
>>>>>>> uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU,
>>>>>>> the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A complication for the transition is the inability to build the gdal
>>>>>>> package on armhf, due to an issue with ca-certificates-java:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Setting up ca-certificates-java (20170531+nmu1) ...
>>>>>>>  Error: missing `server' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-armhf/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so'.
>>>>>>>  Please install or use the JRE or JDK that contains these missing components.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But openjdk-8-jdk-headless cannot be installed because it depends on
>>>>>>> ca-certificates-java, see:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdal&arch=armhf&ver=2.2.1%2Bdfsg-2%2Bb2&stamp=1505204615&raw=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's #874276, and that's a blocker to start this.
>>>>>
>>>>> The uninstallable build dependencies are now resolved, but the
>>>>> underlying issue in the ca-certificates-java package apparently has not
>>>>> (based on reopening of the bugreport).
>>>>
>>>> This is fine now, isn't it? And since gl2ps has migrated, let's go ahead with this.
>>>
>>> Yes, the builds on armhf succeeded now.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the go-ahead, I've just uploaded gdal (2.2.2+dfsg-1), liblas
>>> (1.8.1-5) & libgdal-grass (2.2.2-1) to unstable.
>>
>> It looks like openscenegraph-3.4 (3.4.1+dfsg1-1) got out of NEW after
>> the rebuilds started, those builds lacked the gdal requirement.
>>
>> Can you binNMU openscenegraph-3.4 as well?
> 
> Thanks for the osgearth NMU on amd64, for the uncoordinated
> openscenegraph-3.4 transition it also needs to be NMUed on i386 &
> ppc64el (and powerpc).

This transition finished yesterday, with a few removed packages that were not
ready or blocked for unrelated reasons.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: