Bug#876561: transition: gdal
On 10/03/2017 07:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/09/17 22:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 09/27/2017 12:31 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 23/09/17 21:46, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>
>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.2.2.
>>>>
>>>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.2.1 (#866797), there is no SONAME
>>>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol
>>>> changes.
>>>>
>>>> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.2.2 from
>>>> experimental as summarized below, except gazebo.
>>>>
>>>> gazebo (7.8.1+dfsg-1) FTBFS for some unclear reason unrelated to gdal
>>>> (it FTBFS with plain unstable too):
>>>>
>>>> [ 88%] Built target gazebo_gui
>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/gazebo-7.8.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
>>>> Makefile:165: recipe for target 'all' failed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.2.2 version will be
>>>> uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU,
>>>> the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A complication for the transition is the inability to build the gdal
>>>> package on armhf, due to an issue with ca-certificates-java:
>>>>
>>>> Setting up ca-certificates-java (20170531+nmu1) ...
>>>> Error: missing `server' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-armhf/jre/lib/arm/server/libjvm.so'.
>>>> Please install or use the JRE or JDK that contains these missing components.
>>>>
>>>> But openjdk-8-jdk-headless cannot be installed because it depends on
>>>> ca-certificates-java, see:
>>>>
>>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdal&arch=armhf&ver=2.2.1%2Bdfsg-2%2Bb2&stamp=1505204615&raw=0
>>>
>>> That's #874276, and that's a blocker to start this.
>>
>> The uninstallable build dependencies are now resolved, but the
>> underlying issue in the ca-certificates-java package apparently has not
>> (based on reopening of the bugreport).
>
> This is fine now, isn't it? And since gl2ps has migrated, let's go ahead with this.
Yes, the builds on armhf succeeded now.
Thanks for the go-ahead, I've just uploaded gdal (2.2.2+dfsg-1), liblas
(1.8.1-5) & libgdal-grass (2.2.2-1) to unstable.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: