[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#874198: stretch-pu: package opendkim/2.11.0~alpha-10+deb9u1




On September 24, 2017 9:29:21 AM EDT, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> wrote:
>Control: tag -1 pending
>
>On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 01:57:30PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 23, 2017 05:00:48 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
>> > 
>> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:48:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > > On Saturday, September 09, 2017 04:45:34 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>> > > > 
>> > > > On Sun, Sep  3, 2017 at 20:43:55 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > > > > Thanks to me not understanding some things about systemd
>service files
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > how they interacted with opendkim (and incomplete testing on
>my part),
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > package, as released for stretch, is pretty non-functional.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Is there a risk of setups where things currently work in
>stretch but
>> > > > won't after these changes?  Or where the update ends up with
>opendkim
>> > > > running as root, say because the service file gets updated but
>> > > > opendkim.conf doesn't?  This might be worth a note in
>NEWS.Debian to
>> > > > give people a chance to double check?
>> > > > 
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Julien
>> > > 
>> > > Good point.  Revised debdiff attached.  How about this?
>> > > 
>> > > Scott K
>> > 
>> > Looks good to me, please go ahead.
>> > 
>> > Thanks,
>> 
>> Thanks.  Uploaded.
>
>Flagged for acceptance. Lintian warns of a spelling error in the news
>file, but not one I'm too worried about unless you're very keen to fix
>it.
>
>Thanks,

I'm not very keen to fix it.

Thanks,

Scott K


Reply to: