On Saturday, September 23, 2017 05:00:48 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:48:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Saturday, September 09, 2017 04:45:34 PM Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 20:43:55 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > > Thanks to me not understanding some things about systemd service files > > > > and > > > > how they interacted with opendkim (and incomplete testing on my part), > > > > the > > > > package, as released for stretch, is pretty non-functional. > > > > > > Is there a risk of setups where things currently work in stretch but > > > won't after these changes? Or where the update ends up with opendkim > > > running as root, say because the service file gets updated but > > > opendkim.conf doesn't? This might be worth a note in NEWS.Debian to > > > give people a chance to double check? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Julien > > > > Good point. Revised debdiff attached. How about this? > > > > Scott K > > Looks good to me, please go ahead. > > Thanks, Thanks. Uploaded. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.