[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#869754: stretch-pu: package node-dateformat/1.0.11-3



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

This fixes RC bug #863934. debdiff attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

diff -Nru node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/changelog node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/changelog
--- node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/changelog	2017-05-07 21:12:21.000000000 +0530
+++ node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/changelog	2017-07-26 12:10:55.000000000 +0530
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+node-dateformat (1.0.11-3+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Pirate Praveen ]
+  * Set TZ=UTC for tests to fix FTBFS (Closes: #863934)
+
+ -- Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org>  Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:10:55 +0530
+
 node-dateformat (1.0.11-3) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Fixed FTBFS (Closes: #861592); Thanks Florian Vessaz
diff -Nru node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/rules node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/rules
--- node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/rules	2017-05-07 21:12:21.000000000 +0530
+++ node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/rules	2017-07-26 12:07:44.000000000 +0530
@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@
 
 
 override_dh_auto_test:
-	TZ=Etc/UTC mocha -R spec
+	TZ=UTC mocha -R spec
diff -Nru node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/tests/control node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/tests/control
--- node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/tests/control	2017-05-07 21:12:21.000000000 +0530
+++ node-dateformat-1.0.11/debian/tests/control	2017-07-26 12:07:44.000000000 +0530
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Tests: require
 Depends: node-dateformat
 
-Test-Command: mocha -R spec
+Test-Command: TZ=UTC mocha -R spec
 Depends: @, @builddeps@

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: