[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#866389: marked as done (transition: perl 5.26)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:50:43 +0200
with message-id <4fabc36c-bdbf-16df-7f71-b4d9f7e114e0@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#866389: transition: perl 5.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #866389,
regarding transition: perl 5.26
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
866389: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866389
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org

We'd like to get Perl 5.26 in sid/buster soonish.

As usual, we've done test rebuilds of packages build dependending on perl.
Things are looking pretty good. Known issues are at

 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.26-transition;users=debian-perl@lists.debian.org

and should be marked as blockers of this bug next.

We'll ping this bug when things are ready, but please let us know if
you have any preference about the timing.

It might be prudent to decouple the move to versioned Provides (see
#758100 and the thread at [1]) from the rest of the transition and do
it with 5.24 in sid first. I hope to have time for that next week.

 [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00236.html

-- 
Niko Tyni   ntyni@debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 22/07/17 10:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/07/17 10:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 21/07/17 22:53, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 20/07/17 22:51, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>>>> Control: block -1 with 869139
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:16:41PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/07/17 21:01, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 07:51:33PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>>>> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.26.html
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let us know when it would be OK to upload Perl 5.26 to sid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Awesome. Now is a good time. I have added some hints for the gsoap and
>>>>>> libprelude transitions, so they don't get entangled with this one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks. I have an upload (almost) ready, but a last minute issue popped
>>>>> up as the fixed syslog-ng-incubator fails to build on s390x. See #869139.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you want me to hold off because of that?
>>>>
>>>> I think we can go ahead and worst case remove it as we were planning to before
>>>> it got fixed.
>>>
>>> Thanks. Uploaded earlier today, noting here for the sake of completeness.
>>
>> And binNMUs are scheduled for levels 1 and 2 since yesterday (not without
>> problems as I forgot that we need --extra-depends here, given perl-base is
>> installed on the chroots). Things were building fine now, I'll schedule the rest
>> of the binNMUs if things are looking fine.
> 
> binNMUs scheduled for all the rest as well, as things are looking good and the
> fast architectures are finished or almost finished.

Took a bit for armhf to catch up with the binNMUs, but after it did, things were
almost ready. With a handful of removals, perl is in testing now! Thanks to Ivo
for debugging and working around a britney crash.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: