Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
Control: tags -1 pending
On 25/06/17 13:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FTR:
>>>
>>> >From 2017-05-29:
>>>
>>> 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already plan what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get a ACK for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after the release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;)
>>> 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds.
>>> 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - https://bugs.debian.org/862189
>>> 12:39 < pochu> ack
>>> 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :)
>>>
>>> So uploaded now.
>>>
>>> firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway.
>>>
>>> As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release
>>> said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the
>>> bin-NMU.
>>
>> binNMUs scheduled, excluding firefox (bd-uninst) firefox-esr (was waiting for it
>> to migrate, I'll binNMU it at some point) and libreoffice.
>
> firefox-esr migrated, and now has a maintainer upload so hopefully won't
> need a binNMU. It does not yet build though, because it depends on an
> unavailable version of libsqlite (so we'll possibly need to transition that
> when it happens, to unblock this one).
>
> Or we could do removals, but that feels a bit ew.
Given hunspell already migrated to testing, this is not blocking anything, so
there's no rush to get it finished. Thus there's no need to remove firefox-esr
(plus any rdeps). This should just sort itself out in due time.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: