[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#862832: marked as done (unblock: minissdpd/1.2.20130907-4.1)

Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2017 19:54:00 +0000
with message-id <617aba93-5daf-7405-1c15-08b3c75fb298@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#862832: unblock: minissdpd/1.2.20130907-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #862832,
regarding unblock: minissdpd/1.2.20130907-4.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
862832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Please unblock package minissdpd

In version 1.2.20130907-4, After=network-online.target was added in the
.service file, see #861231.

The problem is that network-online.target is not pulled in the
dependency chain by default, so "Wants=network-online.target" is also
needed.

In the old LSB initscript, there was also a "Should-Start: $network",
After/Wants=network-online.target is the equivalant for systemd.

$ debdiff minissdpd_1.2.20130907-4.dsc minissdpd_1.2.20130907-4.1.dsc
diff -Nru minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/changelog minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/changelog
--- minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/changelog	2017-04-26 17:07:25.000000000 +0200
+++ minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/changelog	2017-05-08 16:12:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+minissdpd (1.2.20130907-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Also add Wants=network-online.target in the .service file,
+    network-online.target is not part of the default dependency chain, this
+    should really (Closes: #861231)
+
+ -- Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>  Mon, 08 May 2017 16:12:09 +0200
+
 minissdpd (1.2.20130907-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Add After=network-online.target in the .service file (Closes: #861231).
diff -Nru minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/minissdpd.service minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/minissdpd.service
--- minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/minissdpd.service	2017-04-26 17:07:25.000000000 +0200
+++ minissdpd-1.2.20130907/debian/minissdpd.service	2017-05-08 16:12:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 Description=keep memory of all UPnP devices that announced themselves
 Documentation=man:minissdpd(1)
 After=network-online.target
+Wants=network-online.target
 
 [Service]
 Type=forking

unblock minissdpd/1.2.20130907-4.1

Thanks,

Laurent Bigonville

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Laurent Bigonville:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please unblock package minissdpd
> 
> In version 1.2.20130907-4, After=network-online.target was added in the
> .service file, see #861231.
> 
> The problem is that network-online.target is not pulled in the
> dependency chain by default, so "Wants=network-online.target" is also
> needed.
> 
> In the old LSB initscript, there was also a "Should-Start: $network",
> After/Wants=network-online.target is the equivalant for systemd.
> 
> [...]
> 
> unblock minissdpd/1.2.20130907-4.1
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Laurent Bigonville
> 
> [...]


Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: