[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#749038: marked as done (Autoremoval reports when RC bugs fixed in unstable)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2017 22:26:20 +0200
with message-id <1aa7600b-0db3-654d-bee2-9c4e7e0c3634@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Autoremoval reports when RC bugs fixed in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #749038,
regarding Autoremoval reports when RC bugs fixed in unstable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
749038: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org

Hi,

I noticed that the PTS still reports pending autoremovals even when all
RC bug(s) in question are fixed in unstable and are simply awaiting
migration, which seems unwanted: the PTS wording implies that there is
work to be done, and it's likely to cause unnecessary worry amongst
reverse-dependencies; at least whilst the package is simply aging
in unstable rather than because there are issues preventing it
migrating to testing.

Is this something that can be fixed? I would guess that this should
be fixed at the underlying autoremovals level rather than PTS display,
hence filing the bug here.

Cheers,
Dominic.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 23 May 2014 11:21:55 +0100 Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> wrote:
> I noticed that the PTS still reports pending autoremovals even when all
> RC bug(s) in question are fixed in unstable and are simply awaiting
> migration, which seems unwanted: the PTS wording implies that there is
> work to be done, and it's likely to cause unnecessary worry amongst
> reverse-dependencies; at least whilst the package is simply aging
> in unstable rather than because there are issues preventing it
> migrating to testing.

I believe this is already fixed. Today I see this for mate-panel¹:
excuses:

    Migration status: WAITING: Waiting for test results, another package
or too young (no action required now - check later)
    Too young, only 4 of 10 days old
    Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by nthykier
    Piuparts tested OK -
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/m/mate-panel.html
    Not considered

> Is this something that can be fixed? I would guess that this should
> be fixed at the underlying autoremovals level rather than PTS display,
> hence filing the bug here.

I believe the bug should have been filed against the qa.debian.org
pseudo package, as advertised on the bottom of every pts page (I assume
you really mean the pts and not it's replacement tracker.d.o).

Paul

¹ https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mate-panel.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: