[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: autoremoval should take alternate depends into account when considering affected reverse dependencies



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # I really got confused by the title of this bug, I think it was missing a "not"
> # phasing it positive instead of "not ignore"
> retitle 745475 autoremoval should take alternate depends into account when considering affected reverse dependencies
Bug #745475 [release.debian.org] autoremoval should ignore alternate depends when considering affected reverse dependencies
Changed Bug title to 'autoremoval should take alternate depends into account when considering affected reverse dependencies' from 'autoremoval should ignore alternate depends when considering affected reverse dependencies'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
745475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: