Hi, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> (2017-04-06): > On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 at 10:22:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Tempted to NACK this for the time being. A line must be drawn, and > > things are getting into shape for the release; since it was uploaded > > today, I think it can mature a bit in unstable until Stretch RC 3 is > > out. > > I'm happy to let this not migrate for a bit, as long as we don't find > a security vulnerability in dbus in the meantime. > > Having had permission to release this in the first place, I'd like to > get it into stretch eventually, so that upstream releases don't have > to either revert a valid bugfix or contain a non-security fix if/when > there's a security issue (realistically I expect to have to do at least > one 1.10.z security release during stretch's lifetime). My objection right now is only about the timing, I'm not trying to get your work delayed until after stretch. I think I've already done some extra work in the past to make sure stuff which weren't block-udeb'd got into testing after the release. Hope it clarifies. KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature