Your message dated Fri, 3 Feb 2017 23:25:27 +0100 with message-id <2029a4f0-45ff-71fe-b84b-c488d9ba607a@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#853974: unblock: src:texlive-base/2016.20170123-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #853974, regarding unblock: src:texlive-base/2016.20170123-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 853974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853974 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: src:texlive-base/2016.20170123-1
- From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 01:31:57 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 148605311773.18729.15455082353005066149.reportbug@burischnitzel.preining.info>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear release managers, I would like to ask for an unblock of src:texlive-base src:texlive-extra of the versions in sid: 2016.20170123-1 It was planned that these packages enter testing together, but as missing dependency (see bug 853119) of texlive-base onto fonts-lmodern created an RC bug as some (one?) package now fails to build from source. Unfortunately src:texlive-lang has transitioned to testing, but with an RC bug 852611 that prohibits updates, as it requires a newer texlive-base. That means, at the moment we have an RC bug in src:texlive-lang, that can only be fixed by getting a newer texlive-base into testing, and at the same time a newer src:texlive-extra. (See bug reports 852611 and its merged ones, and 853970) All the packages have been long enough in sid, and the only errors reported are due to incomplete or too weak dependencies. I have packages for all three (texlive-{base,lang,extra} ready with fixed and tightened dependencies. I propose to *first* let current texlive-{base,extra} go into testing to unbreak the current complete hang, and after that I will upload fixed dependency packages to sid and ask for another unblock of these new packages, where the only changes are dependency changes. Thanks a lot Norbert -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.10.0-rc6 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>, 853974-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#853974: unblock: src:texlive-base/2016.20170123-1
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 23:25:27 +0100
- Message-id: <2029a4f0-45ff-71fe-b84b-c488d9ba607a@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20170203110212.ihgmlqzmjomahyf6@burischnitzel.preining.info>
- References: <[🔎] 148605311773.18729.15455082353005066149.reportbug@burischnitzel.preining.info> <[🔎] 6c26a076-3acb-c668-5d96-4e6bbf52d6e4@thykier.net> <[🔎] 20170203110212.ihgmlqzmjomahyf6@burischnitzel.preining.info>
On 03/02/17 12:02, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Niels, > >> Deal, I have asked Britney to ignore #853119 for >> texlive-base/2016.20170123-1. It should migrate on the next britney run >> (but please confirm that before uploading the next version). > > Thanks for your understanding and prompt action, I will > wait until the packages have migrated to testing before uploading > new packages. It has just migrated. Cheers, Emilio
--- End Message ---