Your message dated Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:23:25 +0000 with message-id <20160207162325.GA11394@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#812887: transition: iptables has caused the Debian Bug report #812887, regarding transition: iptables to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 812887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812887 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: iptables
- From: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:58:41 +0100
- Message-id: <145391032134.13167.1610926435250012272.reportbug@r2d2.cica.es>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian. The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if any). Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0]. Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine: * xtables-addons: no problems * connman: no problems * west-chamer: no problems So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable. [0] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions Ben file: title = "iptables"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ "iptables-dev" | .build-depends ~ "libxtables10" | .build-depends ~ "libxtables11"; is_good = .build-depends ~ "libxtables11"; is_bad = .build-depends ~ "libxtables10";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com>, 812887-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#812887: transition: iptables
- From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:23:25 +0000
- Message-id: <20160207162325.GA11394@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net>
- In-reply-to: <145391032134.13167.1610926435250012272.reportbug@r2d2.cica.es>
- References: <145391032134.13167.1610926435250012272.reportbug@r2d2.cica.es>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:58:41PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian. > > The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to > libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if any). > > Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0]. > Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all > reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine: > > * xtables-addons: no problems > * connman: no problems > * west-chamer: no problems > > So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable. The transition completed. -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---