Your message dated Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:24:31 +0000 with message-id <20160207162431.GA11484@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#811219: transition: netcdf has caused the Debian Bug report #811219, regarding transition: netcdf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 811219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811219 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: netcdf
- From: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:32:37 +0100
- Message-id: <145298715736.9326.2306596622593952028.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition NetCDF 4.4.0 final has been released and bumps the SOVERSION to 11 accounting for the removed symbols in RC4. Fortunately we only have to transition netcdf, and not also the C++ & Fortran packages. Only a few packages FTBFS: minc (2.2.00-6) FTBFS, this is the same issue as the for the previous netcdf transition (#793885), which has been fixed in libminc, but not minc. python-scientific (2.9.4-3) FTBFS due to an old issue too (#799195). mmtk (2.7.9-1) FTBFS due to #798665, and requires python-scientific. These packages are sid-only already, so shouldn't be much of an issue for this transition. Transition: netcdf libnetcdf7 (1:4.4.0~rc3-1) -> libnetcdf11 (1:4.4.0-1~exp1) The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows. adios (1.9.0-6) OK cmor (2.9.1-6.1) OK dx (1:4.4.4-8) OK exodusii (6.02.dfsg.1-6.1) OK gdal (1.11.3+dfsg-2 / 2.0.1+dfsg-1~exp1) OK / OK gerris (20131206+dfsg-6) OK gnudatalanguage (0.9.6v2-1) OK grace (1:5.1.25-1) OK grads (2:2.0.2-8) OK gri (2.12.23-9) OK kst (2.0.3-4) OK libminc (2.3.00-2) OK libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.20-1.1) OK minc (2.2.00-6) FTBFS nco (4.5.4-1) OK ncview (2.1.6+ds-1) OK netcdf-cxx (4.2.1-2) OK netcdf-cxx-legacy (4.2-3) OK netcdf-fortran (4.4.2-3) OK netcdf4-python (1.2.2-1) OK octave-octcdf (1.1.8-1) OK ovito (2.3.3+dfsg1-2) OK python-scientific (2.9.4-3) FTBFS r-cran-ncdf4 (1.15-1) OK r-cran-rnetcdf (1.6.3-1-1) OK ruby-netcdf (0.7.1.1-6) OK v-sim (3.7.2-1) OK cdftools (3.0-2~exp1.1) OK etsf-io (1.0.4-1~exp1.1) OK ferret-vis (6.9.3-4) OK gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-3) OK grass (7.0.2-2 / 7.0.3~rc2-1~exp1) OK / OK magics++ (2.26.2-2) OK minc-tools (2.3.00+dfsg-1) OK mmtk (2.7.9-1) FTBFS ncl (6.3.0-6) OK oasis3 (3.mct+dfsg.121022-7) OK vtk (5.10.1+dfsg-2) OK vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-4) OK cdo (1.7.0+dfsg.1-2) OK ifrit (4.1.2-1) OK metview (4.6.1-2) OK Kind Regards, Bas Ben file: title = "netcdf"; is_affected = (.build-depends ~ /libnetcdf-dev/)|(.depends ~ /libnetcdfc?(7|11)/); is_good = .depends ~ /libnetcdf11/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libnetcdfc?7/;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>, 811219-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#811219: transition: netcdf
- From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:24:31 +0000
- Message-id: <20160207162431.GA11484@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net>
- In-reply-to: <145298715736.9326.2306596622593952028.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>
- References: <145298715736.9326.2306596622593952028.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:32:37AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > NetCDF 4.4.0 final has been released and bumps the SOVERSION to 11 > accounting for the removed symbols in RC4. Fortunately we only have to > transition netcdf, and not also the C++ & Fortran packages. Only a few > packages FTBFS: > > minc (2.2.00-6) FTBFS, this is the same issue as the for the previous > netcdf transition (#793885), which has been fixed in libminc, but not minc. > > python-scientific (2.9.4-3) FTBFS due to an old issue too (#799195). > > mmtk (2.7.9-1) FTBFS due to #798665, and requires python-scientific. > > These packages are sid-only already, so shouldn't be much of an issue > for this transition. The transition completed. -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---