[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0



In data venerdì 4 novembre 2016 23:56:44 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
> On 31/10/16 08:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 31/10/16 07:57, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >> In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
> >>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >>>
> >>> On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >>>> In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
> >>>>> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >>>>>> In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
> >>>>>>>> - libpoppler61 → libpoppler64
> >>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>>   boomaga
> >>>>>>>>   calligra
> >>>>>>>>   cups-filters
> >>>>>>>>   emacs-pdf-tools
> >>>>>>>>   gambas3
> >>>>>>>>   gdal
> >>>>>>>>   gdcm
> >>>>>>>>   inkscape
> >>>>>>>>   ipe-tools
> >>>>>>>>   pdf2djvu
> >>>>>>>>   pdf2htmlex
> >>>>>>>>   popplerkit.framework
> >>>>>>>>   texlive-bin
> >>>>>>>>   texworks
> >>>>>>>>   xpdf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I believe there's stuff missing there for whatever reason. E.g. libreoffice
> >>>>>>> (via libreoffice-pdfimport, https://packages.debian.org/sid/libreoffice-pdfimport).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Was in your last transition bugs afaicr, so I wonder what went wrong this time ;)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Oh right, sorry, it was indeed missing.  In the above list there is also:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   libreoffice
> >>>>>>   openscenegraph
> >>>>>>   openscenegraph-3.4
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see the new poppler is now in experimental. Do the rdeps build against the new
> >>>>> version?
> >>>>
> >>>> I could test everything but LibreOffice: no failures.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rene, could you please give LO + poppler/experimental a try? Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Rene told me LO is fine. Please go ahead.
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late reply -- I was busy and thus I couldn't dedicate the
> >> proper time to follow the transition.
> >>
> >> Is the slot for this transtition still open, or should I wait for any
> >> other in progress transitions?
> > 
> > Let's wait for the gdal transition to finish. Thanks for checking first.
> 
> gdal is done. Let's do this.

Thanks! Uploaded few hours ago, and at this point built and uploaded on
all the release architectures (and not only those).

-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: