Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0
On 31/10/16 08:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 31/10/16 07:57, Pino Toscano wrote:
>> In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>> In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>>>>> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>>> In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>>>>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
>>>>>>>> - libpoppler61 → libpoppler64
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> boomaga
>>>>>>>> calligra
>>>>>>>> cups-filters
>>>>>>>> emacs-pdf-tools
>>>>>>>> gambas3
>>>>>>>> gdal
>>>>>>>> gdcm
>>>>>>>> inkscape
>>>>>>>> ipe-tools
>>>>>>>> pdf2djvu
>>>>>>>> pdf2htmlex
>>>>>>>> popplerkit.framework
>>>>>>>> texlive-bin
>>>>>>>> texworks
>>>>>>>> xpdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe there's stuff missing there for whatever reason. E.g. libreoffice
>>>>>>> (via libreoffice-pdfimport, https://packages.debian.org/sid/libreoffice-pdfimport).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was in your last transition bugs afaicr, so I wonder what went wrong this time ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh right, sorry, it was indeed missing. In the above list there is also:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> libreoffice
>>>>>> openscenegraph
>>>>>> openscenegraph-3.4
>>>>>
>>>>> I see the new poppler is now in experimental. Do the rdeps build against the new
>>>>> version?
>>>>
>>>> I could test everything but LibreOffice: no failures.
>>>>
>>>> Rene, could you please give LO + poppler/experimental a try? Thanks!
>>>
>>> Rene told me LO is fine. Please go ahead.
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply -- I was busy and thus I couldn't dedicate the
>> proper time to follow the transition.
>>
>> Is the slot for this transtition still open, or should I wait for any
>> other in progress transitions?
>
> Let's wait for the gdal transition to finish. Thanks for checking first.
gdal is done. Let's do this.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: