Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0
On 31/10/16 07:57, Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>> In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
>>>> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>> In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>>>>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
>>>>>>> - libpoppler61 → libpoppler64
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> boomaga
>>>>>>> calligra
>>>>>>> cups-filters
>>>>>>> emacs-pdf-tools
>>>>>>> gambas3
>>>>>>> gdal
>>>>>>> gdcm
>>>>>>> inkscape
>>>>>>> ipe-tools
>>>>>>> pdf2djvu
>>>>>>> pdf2htmlex
>>>>>>> popplerkit.framework
>>>>>>> texlive-bin
>>>>>>> texworks
>>>>>>> xpdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe there's stuff missing there for whatever reason. E.g. libreoffice
>>>>>> (via libreoffice-pdfimport, https://packages.debian.org/sid/libreoffice-pdfimport).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was in your last transition bugs afaicr, so I wonder what went wrong this time ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh right, sorry, it was indeed missing. In the above list there is also:
>>>>>
>>>>> libreoffice
>>>>> openscenegraph
>>>>> openscenegraph-3.4
>>>>
>>>> I see the new poppler is now in experimental. Do the rdeps build against the new
>>>> version?
>>>
>>> I could test everything but LibreOffice: no failures.
>>>
>>> Rene, could you please give LO + poppler/experimental a try? Thanks!
>>
>> Rene told me LO is fine. Please go ahead.
>
> Sorry for the late reply -- I was busy and thus I couldn't dedicate the
> proper time to follow the transition.
>
> Is the slot for this transtition still open, or should I wait for any
> other in progress transitions?
Let's wait for the gdal transition to finish. Thanks for checking first.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: