Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
On 04/10/16 19:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> Hi Sylvestre,
>> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>> User: email@example.com
>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>> This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM.
>>>> This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition:
>>>> * takes too much time
>>>> * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release
>>>> * 3.7 is no longer maintained
>>>> * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive
>>>> * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8
>>> Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed:
>> Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the
>> call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on armel.
>> Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel.
>> Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway.
>> So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me know
>> when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs.
clamav freemat gnome-builder and libclang-perl binNMUed.