Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:55:11 +0000 with message-id <20160628175455.GE12455@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#827291: transition: libpodofo has caused the Debian Bug report #827291, regarding transition: libpodofo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 827291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libpodofo
- From: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:08:51 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160614170846.GA21989@chase.mapreri.org>
Package: release.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I've got another libpodofo soname bump, from libpodofo0.9.3 to libpodofo0.9.4. The 3 affected packages (scribus, calibre and krename) all builds fine. calibre is currently entangled with the Qt private abi bump, and currently can't be built due to pyqt5 not being rebuilt yet. With a rebuilt pyqt5 calibre builds fine and gains dependencies on both libpodofo0.9.4 and qtbase-abi-5-6-1; that means that you either prefer to hold calibre and rebuild it only once for both transitions, or rebuild it twice; please tell me what you prefer :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 827291-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#827291: transition: libpodofo
- From: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:55:11 +0000
- Message-id: <20160628175455.GE12455@chase.mapreri.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160620110955.GF10310@chase.mapreri.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20160614170846.GA21989@chase.mapreri.org> <[🔎] 73ed4fc5-bc43-a9f7-fa4e-8b2485728a0d@debian.org> <[🔎] a0e85b53-5104-6c35-ca93-9372fde52366@debian.org> <[🔎] 20160620110955.GF10310@chase.mapreri.org>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:09:55AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:07:42PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Go ahead. > > ta, uploaded. by now, new libpodofo entered testing, and the old one is gone. So, this is done. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---