Bug#823667: transition: poppler 0.42
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 10/05/16 14:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/05/16 13:34, Pino Toscano wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.42.0 transition.
>> Currently there is Poppler 0.42.0 in experimental already.
>>
>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
>> - libpoppler57 → libpoppler60
>>
>> Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their
>> situation, sorted by solutions:
>>
>> Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed:
>>
>> boomaga
>> cups-filters
>> gambas3
>> gdal
>> gdcm
>> inkscape
>> ipe-tools
>> libreoffice
>> pdf2djvu
>> pdf2htmlex
>> popplerkit.framework
>> texlive-bin
>> texworks
>> xpdf
>>
>> Sources that currently FTBFS:
>>
>> * calligra
>> FTBFS for other reasons, not in testing already (can be ignored)
>>
>> Other cases:
>>
>> * derivations
>> This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is
>> only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of
>> that application are left in the resulting arch:all package.
>>
>> A change in poppler-glib 0.39 is the removal of an unused enum; this so
>> far impacted only two sources:
>> - ruby-gnome2 (#812677, fixed)
>> - python-poppler (#812680)
>> OTOH, this issue does not directly affect the libpoppler transition.
>>
>> I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the
>> following usertag:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.39
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.40
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.42
>
> Let's wait for a few days until the upcoming gdal upload migrates to testing.
Assuming there are no significant build regressions with the new version, you
can go ahead.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: