Bug#823667: transition: poppler 0.42
On 07/05/16 13:34, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.42.0 transition.
> Currently there is Poppler 0.42.0 in experimental already.
>
> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
> - libpoppler57 → libpoppler60
>
> Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their
> situation, sorted by solutions:
>
> Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed:
>
> boomaga
> cups-filters
> gambas3
> gdal
> gdcm
> inkscape
> ipe-tools
> libreoffice
> pdf2djvu
> pdf2htmlex
> popplerkit.framework
> texlive-bin
> texworks
> xpdf
>
> Sources that currently FTBFS:
>
> * calligra
> FTBFS for other reasons, not in testing already (can be ignored)
>
> Other cases:
>
> * derivations
> This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is
> only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of
> that application are left in the resulting arch:all package.
>
> A change in poppler-glib 0.39 is the removal of an unused enum; this so
> far impacted only two sources:
> - ruby-gnome2 (#812677, fixed)
> - python-poppler (#812680)
> OTOH, this issue does not directly affect the libpoppler transition.
>
> I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the
> following usertag:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.39
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.40
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.42
Let's wait for a few days until the upcoming gdal upload migrates to testing.
Emilio
Reply to: