[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#815260: marked as done (transition: libpgm)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 13:12:17 +0200
with message-id <5742E591.5080907@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#815260: transition: libpgm
has caused the Debian Bug report #815260,
regarding transition: libpgm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
815260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

A small transition of libpgm, its soname changed from 5.1 to 5.2 which
is already in experimental.

Affected packages are:
libxs
zeromq
zeromq3

Library packages are co-installable and can be a smooth transition.
However libxs and zeromq need sourceful uploads. The latter is not a
problem as I'm its maintainer.
The former, libxs package seems to be an abandoned one. Upstream no
longer exists, last maintainer upload[1] was in 2012 and NMUed in 2013.
The zeromq{,3} uploads will be handled by me. Of course, I can further
NMU libxs if needed or provide patch for maintainer upload.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libx/libxs/news/20120613T174733Z.htm
l

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 13/03/16 12:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/02/16 20:02, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>>> On 20/02/16 14:29, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>>> Looks like your zeromq3 upload started another transition. Not sure whether to
>>> just binNMU the rdeps... Have you build-tested them?
>>   Yes, build tested level 2 already. The build dependency name changed
>> from libzmq3-dev to libzmq5-dev making binNMUs not an option. Already
>> contacted the maintainers, notifying what they need to do to make the
>> packages build again.
>> As I recall, two packages need other changes: ignition-transport and
>> uwsgi. Checking these soon.
> 
> Can you please file bugs with severity:serious for all the packages that haven't
> been adapted yet?

This was blocked on the zeromq3 transition, which was waiting for haskell. That
just happened and this is over.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: