[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#790756: marked as done (transition: libstdc++6 cxx11)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:12:52 +0100
with message-id <56CE2AE4.3090000@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#790756: transition: libstdc++6 cxx11
has caused the Debian Bug report #790756,
regarding transition: libstdc++6 cxx11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
790756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

This is the libstdc++6 cxx11 transition as outlined in [1].  It will trigger up
to 400 other transitions once GCC 5 is made the default (see [2] for the
probably affected packages).

$ cat libstdc++6.ben
title = "libstdc++6";

is_affected = .depends ~ /libstdc\+\+6/ & !.package ~ /gcc-2.95|gcc-[45]/;

is_good = .depends ~ /libstdc\+\+6 \(>= 5/;

is_bad = .depends ~ /libstdc\+\+6(,|$)|libstdc\+\+6 \(>= [234]/;


[1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/07/msg00005.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 12/02/16 18:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/07/15 16:30, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
>> This is the libstdc++6 cxx11 transition as outlined in [1].  It will trigger up
>> to 400 other transitions once GCC 5 is made the default (see [2] for the
>> probably affected packages).
> 
> AFAICS none of the few remaining packages with RC transition bugs are in
> testing. Thus I think we can close this now.

Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: