[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default



On 2015-08-03 23:23, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2015-08-03 22:11, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> usertag 790994 + transition
> block 790994 by 790756
> reassign 790994 release.debian.org
> tag 790994 + patch
> tag 790994 + fixed-in-experimental
> thanks
>
> On 2015-08-01 13:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2015-07-29 22:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On 07/29/2015 09:35 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > ccfits will need a transition. Please find the patch for it below.
> > >
> > > missing Conflicts/Replaces or Breaks/Replaces
> >
> > Indeed, good catch. Here is an updated debdiff. I have uploaded the
> > package to experimental, to get the NEW processing done faster.
> >
> > Given it doesn't have any build-depends on c++ libraries besides
> > libstdc++-dev and doesn't have any reverse depends, I can upload
> > it to unstable as soon as GCC 5 is the default on all architectures and
> > on buildds.
>
> The package in experimental went out of NEW and has been built
> successfully on all architectures. I made a mistake in the above
> statement, this package actually has one reverse dependency,
> luminance-hdr, so a very small transition is needed.
>
> I am ready to get the package uploaded to unstable, when I get the green
> light for that.

Yes please.

Ok thanks. Just uploaded it to unstable.

binNMU scheduled.

--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits


Reply to: