[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#790994: ccfits: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default



On 2015-08-03 22:11, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
> 
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > usertag 790994 + transition
> > block 790994 by 790756
> > reassign 790994 release.debian.org
> > tag 790994 + patch
> > tag 790994 + fixed-in-experimental
> > thanks
> > 
> > On 2015-08-01 13:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2015-07-29 22:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > On 07/29/2015 09:35 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > > ccfits will need a transition. Please find the patch for it below.
> > > > 
> > > > missing Conflicts/Replaces or Breaks/Replaces
> > > 
> > > Indeed, good catch. Here is an updated debdiff. I have uploaded the
> > > package to experimental, to get the NEW processing done faster.
> > > 
> > > Given it doesn't have any build-depends on c++ libraries besides
> > > libstdc++-dev and doesn't have any reverse depends, I can upload
> > > it to unstable as soon as GCC 5 is the default on all architectures and
> > > on buildds.
> > 
> > The package in experimental went out of NEW and has been built
> > successfully on all architectures. I made a mistake in the above
> > statement, this package actually has one reverse dependency,
> > luminance-hdr, so a very small transition is needed.
> > 
> > I am ready to get the package uploaded to unstable, when I get the green
> > light for that.
> 
> Yes please.

Ok thanks. Just uploaded it to unstable.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: