[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#787692: marked as done (release.debian.org: jessie-pu: package ufraw/0.20-2+deb8u1)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2015 14:31:07 +0100
with message-id <1441459867.2151.32.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing p-u bugs for 8.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #787692,
regarding release.debian.org: jessie-pu: package ufraw/0.20-2+deb8u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
787692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787692
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

I have fixed the security issue below for ufraw.  The security team has
marked the issue as no-dsa, but has suggested that it be fixed via
jessie-pu.

Here is an interdiff between the current jessie version and the updated
version:

diff -u ufraw-0.20/dcraw.cc ufraw-0.20/dcraw.cc
--- ufraw-0.20/dcraw.cc
+++ ufraw-0.20/dcraw.cc
@@ -934,8 +934,7 @@
 
 int CLASS ljpeg_start (struct jhead *jh, int info_only)
 {
-  int c, tag;
-  ushort len;
+  int c, tag, len;
   uchar data[0x10000];
   const uchar *dp;
 
@@ -946,9 +945,8 @@
   do {
     fread (data, 2, 2, ifp);
     tag =  data[0] << 8 | data[1];
-    len = (data[2] << 8 | data[3]);
-    if (tag <= 0xff00 || len <= 2) return 0;
-    len -= 2;
+    len = (data[2] << 8 | data[3]) - 2;
+    if (tag <= 0xff00) return 0;
     fread (data, 1, len, ifp);
     switch (tag) {
       case 0xffc3:
diff -u ufraw-0.20/debian/changelog ufraw-0.20/debian/changelog
--- ufraw-0.20/debian/changelog
+++ ufraw-0.20/debian/changelog
@@ -1,11 +1,3 @@
-ufraw (0.20-2+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency=high
-
-  * dcraw.cc: Apply patch from
-    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1027072&action=diff to
-    prevent buffer overflow in ljpeg_start (Closes: #786783, CVE-2015-3885)
-
- -- Hubert Chathi <uhoreg@debian.org>  Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:00 -0400
-
 ufraw (0.20-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * ufraw-gimp.c: Apply upstream patch: Only use


On Mon, 25 May 2015 16:40:00 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> said:

> the following vulnerability was published for ufraw.

> CVE-2015-3885[0]: | Integer overflow in the ljpeg_start function in
> dcraw 7.00 and earlier | allows remote attackers to cause a denial of
> service (crash) via a | crafted image, which triggers a buffer
> overflow, related to the len | variable.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.17-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 8.2

Hi,

These bugs correspond to updates which were included in the 8.2 point
release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: