[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: testing migration, excuses for package harminv





On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Paul Wise wrote:

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de> wrote:

I seem to miss the forest for the trees, but what does
  old binaries left on amd64: libharminv2 (from 1.3.1-10)
mean at [1]?

You started a (minor) transition, please read this:

https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

As I maintain all involved packages, I didn't want to start the whole formalism.

Looks like all the meep related source packages need a binNMU.

Yes, but as soon as I could solve the problems with harminv, there will be also new versions of all meep packages. So from my point of view the binNMU is not really needed.

  Thorsten


Reply to: