Re: testing migration, excuses for package harminv

To: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: testing migration, excuses for package harminv
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:41:50 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6EA_fDQA8PJf9zHdVgHt-YWLUtbumjeZock90=3E0QW8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.02.1506220927370.22132@jupiter.server.alteholz.net>
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.02.1506220927370.22132@jupiter.server.alteholz.net>

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de> wrote:

> I seem to miss the forest for the trees, but what does
>   old binaries left on amd64: libharminv2 (from 1.3.1-10)
> mean at [1]?

You started a (minor) transition, please read this:

https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

Looks like all the meep related source packages need a binNMU.

https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: testing migration, excuses for package harminv
  - From: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>

References:
- testing migration, excuses for package harminv
  - From: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>

Prev by Date: testing migration, excuses for package harminv
Next by Date: Processed: block 789365 with 783682 786539 786540 786541 786542 786543 787449 787451 787452 787565 788800 789014 789015 789016 789017 789018 789456 789459
Previous by thread: testing migration, excuses for package harminv
Next by thread: Re: testing migration, excuses for package harminv
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread