[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#786500: marked as done (nmu: alberta_3.0.1-1)



Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2015 16:30:57 +0200
with message-id <555F3DA1.50609@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#786500: nmu: alberta_3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #786500,
regarding nmu: alberta_3.0.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

libalberta uses a relocation type that should not be used for shared
libraries on powerpc[1] which makes the library unusable. As the build
log looked okay to me and the older version (3.0.0-3) worked, I tried
rebuilding the package on partch.d.o and the bad relocations
disappeared... At least "readelf -a" no longer showed any occurence of
"R_PPC_REL24".

I'm wondering if this was some issue with an older version of the
toolchain; note that alberta uses clang instead of gcc as gcc has a
bug (see link in [1]).

Could you please schedule a binNMU for alberta on powerpc to get it
rebuilt with the current toolchain? Please also consider giving back
dune-grid/2.4~20150506gd3c1350-1 on powerpc in experimental with an
additional build-dep on the binNMU'ed libalberta-dev (>= 2.3.1-1+b1)

Ansgar

nmu alberta_3.0.1-1 . powerpc . -m "Rebuild with current toolchain."
gb dune-grid_2.4~20150506gd3c1350-1 . powerpc . experimental
dw dune-grid_2.4~20150506gd3c1350-1 . powerpc . experimental -m "libalberta-dev (>= 2.3.1-1+b1)"

(Not sure if gb/dw are correct like this.)

  [1] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2015/05/msg00061.html>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 22/05/15 12:02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> Hi,
> 
> libalberta uses a relocation type that should not be used for shared
> libraries on powerpc[1] which makes the library unusable. As the build
> log looked okay to me and the older version (3.0.0-3) worked, I tried
> rebuilding the package on partch.d.o and the bad relocations
> disappeared... At least "readelf -a" no longer showed any occurence of
> "R_PPC_REL24".
> 
> I'm wondering if this was some issue with an older version of the
> toolchain; note that alberta uses clang instead of gcc as gcc has a
> bug (see link in [1]).
> 
> Could you please schedule a binNMU for alberta on powerpc to get it
> rebuilt with the current toolchain? Please also consider giving back
> dune-grid/2.4~20150506gd3c1350-1 on powerpc in experimental with an
> additional build-dep on the binNMU'ed libalberta-dev (>= 2.3.1-1+b1)
> 
> Ansgar
> 
> nmu alberta_3.0.1-1 . powerpc . -m "Rebuild with current toolchain."
> gb dune-grid_2.4~20150506gd3c1350-1 . powerpc . experimental
> dw dune-grid_2.4~20150506gd3c1350-1 . powerpc . experimental -m "libalberta-dev (>= 2.3.1-1+b1)"

All scheduled, with a proper version for libalberta-dev in the dw command.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: