[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd SIGKILL regression in Jessie



On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:25:16 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:

> Hey Niels,
> 
> Niels Thykier [2015-05-18  8:51 +0200]:
> > I see that #784720 is fixed in experimental, but not in sid+testing and
> > accordingly not in Jessie either.  I would prefer if we could prioritise
> > getting this fixed in the first Jessie point release (or failing that,
> > the second).
> > 
> >  * AFAICT, this is a question of uploading systemd to unstable with a
> >    revert for (upstream) commit 743970d[1][2].  Preferably as soon as
> >    possible to increase the testing/exposure.
> > 
> >  * Said revert should then also be cherry-picked to the stable version
> >    (using the normal p-u process of sending a debdiff in a p-u bug
> >     report prior to uploading)
> 
> Fully agreed. I committed that to master branch (for jessie) two weeks
> ago:
> 
>   http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=00aaecd71
> 
> Marco and Michael are still working on this RC bug:
> 
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765577
> 
> Once we have the fix for that, I think it's time to do a new unstable
> upload, and then to jessie too.
> 
What's the reason for delaying the upload?  It's not like this would
prevent fixing the other bug later...

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: