On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:Have you tested that they build fine against the new version of the library?On 15/05/15 06:10, Tom Lee wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello, I'd like to request a transition slot from the release team.
>
> The libhiredis SONAME changed in the latest release from upstream,
> indicating ABI-incompatible changes to the library. Updating the binary
> package to reflect the new SONAME. libhiredis0.13 has been uploaded to
> experimental by my sponsor.
>
> I couldn't quite figure out how to get the Ben file reportbug generated
> for me below to give me a list of dependent packages (this is my first
> request for a transition), but I pulled this list from apt-cache
> rdepends if that's at all useful:
>
> zmap
> webdis
> syslog-ng-mod-redis
> ruby-hiredis
> rspamd
> rfc5766-turn-server
> python-hiredis
> ntopng
> kamailio-redis-modules
> libhiredis-dev
> libhiredis-dbg
> coturn
All seem to build just fine except for webdis, which segfaults during tests. There are no segfaults when building against libhiredis0.10, so looks like it's running afoul of something in the latest release.--