[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#784724: transition: gloox

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
> On 2015-05-08 04:16, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively
>> small
>> transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against
>> newer
>> gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
>> licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
>> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
>> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
>> fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded to sid and now built on all archs. Thanks in advance for
scheduling binNMUs!


Reply to: