[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#784724: transition: gloox

Control: tag -1 confirmed

On 2015-05-08 04:16, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):

licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)

Please go ahead.

Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Reply to: